Score: 8

"Much better!"

submission: Intense Sig Maker v2

date: February 2, 2006

It's improved a lot, and in a short amount of time. Well done!

Now for a bit more detail.

1) The banner selection is a million times better, but there are so many that it gets complicated just having two buttons. If possible, make a menu where one can view multiple downsized samples of the banner design and choose on to their liking.

2) As far as logos go, I'd recommend adding:
a) all the letters of the alphabet.
b) numbers 1-9
c) brainstorm hobbies and find a logo for each (i.e., composing, an eighth note)
d) maybe make the logo draggable with the mouse, so the person can put it exactly where they want
e) an extra option that opens a box of text detailing how you can save your banner and add the logo (that isn't in the program) you want in MS Paint or whatever

3) You definitely need more font selection. If you can manage it, being able to choose exactly where in the banner the text is. Also, bold, italics, and underline options. Finally, similar to my recommendation e for logos, a text box detailing how you can save the banner and add the exact text you want.

This is a very promising program! I'm sure many people will find it useful.

Score: 8

"Actually..."

submission: Intense Sig Maker v1

date: January 24, 2006

Here's how you save it on your computer for PC users:

With the window that has your desired banner up, press the Print Screen key (some laptops may have it as Prnt Scrn), which is somewhere to the top right of the keyboard. Open an image editing program such as regular 'ol paint and Paste (you must not copy or paste anything inbetween those two steps!). Edit out everything else in the image of the screen, edit the banner, save it, whatever floats your boat.

It's a nice idea, but could be expanded on a lot, for example,

-More logos
-Turn-off-music feature

I'm sure you can think of a lot more than that, but y'know, that sort of stuff.

Score: 8

"Look..."

submission: A Film For MyK-Alix

date: January 24, 2006

If the author had WANTED the animation to be better, even a detail like a more accurate cut out of the picture of the girl (very clearly intentionally half-assed!), I'm sure he would have. It should be obvious enough that this was a mockery of Myk-Alix's (or whatever) review.